Arsh Syed, Real Estate Agent & Founder at Real Estate in Toronto

Real Estate in Toronto – REIT

Discovering the best of Toronto's real estate, from downtown condos to suburban family homes. Where Pre-Constructionish Dreams Begin!

How the Housing Market Affects the Economy!

Housing Market

Home is a man’s castle, according to the famous saying. The home an American lives in is the best single indicator of how well he or she is doing financially. It goes beyond what the “American Dream” is about. I wonder why individuals feel like they have to get into the housing market.? People have been advised to purchase their own homes throughout the developed world. The time is now to purchase a home. Climb the ladder of homeownership. Help to Buy assists people in gaining a foothold on the housing ladder. Part of that dream is to own a home.

Real Estate 1 housing market

People generally accept the notion that home ownership is a positive thing. They believe it to be true because it is something they’ve always been told. The obsession with home ownership has produced unintended results that have not only distorted the housing market but also brought the financial system to its knees.

This is everyone’s ultimate objective, and achieving it is the American Dream. It is very frustrating to not be able to own something. People I know in Toronto have always rented since they moved there 20 years ago. Canada has one of the most competitive economies in the world, and the quality of life for its people is very high.

Switzerland has the lowest rate of home ownership in the OECD, which is mostly made up of wealthy countries. It is significantly greater in Britain. Two-thirds of homes are owned by the individuals who occupy them. An estimated house price index shows that the Swiss housing market is much more stable than the British housing market. The value of a home in Switzerland has increased by 70% since 1970. In the same time period, prices in the United Kingdom increased by 346%. There is evidence linking ownership rates with market volatility.

To comprehend why, we must go back one hundred years. The majority of people in Britain, the United States, and other developed countries were renters at the turn of the 20th century. In the United Kingdom, only one in four families owned their own home. But after the Second World War, many governments in the developed world made big changes to their policies. They decided to establish homeownership-based nations.

The idea was that if you are a homeowner and retire, you can sell your home and possibly live off the proceeds. Or, if you lose your job, you at least have assets that you can sell. To encourage home ownership, low-interest loans, tax breaks on mortgages, and capital gains tax relief were implemented. All of these factors amount to a substantial government subsidy for homeownership.

Beginning in the 1950s, the number of Americans who owned a home increased dramatically. The amount of money that banks gave out in mortgages also increased. In 2008, mortgage lending accounted for 63% of the gross domestic product (GDP) of wealthy countries. Long-term, however, this new world of homeowners has created more problems than it has resolved.

A financial disaster has been triggered, and it appears that nobody can stop the bleeding. The massive, global financial crisis that occurred twelve years ago was a housing crisis. As home-owners defaulted on their mortgages at record rates, it became evident that the problem for a large number of Americans was that they believed they were making a prudent financial decision by purchasing a home, which turned out to be demonstrably untrue. The crash was a tragic consequence of the housing market boom. However, the harm caused by encouraging individuals to purchase their own homes extends far beyond financial crises.

The fundamental issue is a shortage of resources. In the 1960s, roughly twice as many houses were constructed per person as they are today. Most of the decline in building has happened in places where you would most like to see an increase. Consequently, these cities are prosperous, dynamic, and productive. Everyone wants to own something and call it their own, but homeowners are more likely to be against more development in their area.

In a country with a high rate of homeownership, homeowners are notorious “not-in-my-backyard” residents. They attempt to preserve the value of their assets by restricting the supply of new assets. They vote for politicians who implement restrictive planning that results in inflexible supply. Therefore, if the economy is thriving and the supply cannot keep up, prices will increase significantly. Therefore, in countries such as the United Kingdom and the United States, where homeownership rates are relatively high, these nations tend to have policies that encourage homeownership and planning systems that result in inflexible supply.

There is always the question of whether or not we should allow housing for young people to devastate our neighborhoods. This mindset is completely out of control, in my opinion. This must change because members of the millennial generation cannot afford basic necessities such as a home. The failure to construct, especially in urban areas, has also hindered productivity and damaged economies. When housing is expensive, it is difficult for people to relocate to cities. And when it is difficult for people to relocate to these cities, it makes it difficult for them to find the jobs they desire. In principle, this restricts the expansion of the economy as a whole.

Homebuyers are less likely to be entrepreneurs and less likely to relocate to find work. Research indicates that historically, an increase in home ownership in the United States has been followed by a sharp increase in unemployment as people are unwilling to relocate to find a new job. The escalating homeownership rate was halted by the financial crisis. Sluggish income growth and tighter mortgage restrictions have severely hampered consumers’ ability to climb the housing ladder.

Politicians are concerned about the decline in homeownership rates. I am in favor of the American Dream coming true. However, it may not be such a bad thing to have more renters. The widespread belief that home ownership is preferable to renting is widespread. It creates a better, more stable society. In reality, there is only a small amount of evidence that home ownership makes people somewhat better citizens.

Supporters of home ownership frequently cite Singapore as an example of a highly stable nation with a high rate of home ownership. There, 91 percent of the population owns their own home, and the country ranks ninth on the United Nations Human Development Index.

However, if we examine Romania, we find that the homeownership rate there is even higher, despite the country’s comparatively low level of development worldwide. Additionally, Switzerland has a system that benefits renters. Prices are stable, renters’ rights are protected, and leases can last up to twenty years. Even so, you could ask our landlord for a price reduction, as the reference interest rates have also decreased.

The primary motivation for consumers to purchase real estate is to stop wasting money on rent each month. This is a frequent argument against renting; however, is it valid? In 2018, rent was more expensive than mortgage payments in the majority of the developed world.

To get a complete picture, however, we must examine all costs over a longer period of time. Consider someone deciding between renting and buying in Britain. If they chose to rent, they would make one payment per month to the landlord. However, if they chose to purchase, they would incur mortgage repayments and interest, which can fluctuate, as well as a multitude of other costs, such as transaction fees, insurance, and maintenance, among others. There are times when renting is a better deal than home ownership, and there are times when home ownership is the better deal. This largely depends on the interest rate and the state of the economy.

Theoretically and practically, however, renting and purchasing a home ultimately cost roughly the same over time. In the end, the answer to the question of which is superior comes down to personal preference. However, it is not true that one is intrinsically and objectively superior to the other. Investing in real estate is not always a wise decision. While many have benefited from rising home prices since the 1970s, those who rushed into the U.S. housing market at the peak of the bubble lost out. Despite this, wealthy-world governments continue to invest in home ownership promotion.

Mortgage-interest deductions exist in the United States and many other countries. Here, homeowners can deduct their mortgage interest from their income tax. The United States loses approximately $100 billion annually in tax revenue due to the mortgage-interest deduction. In addition, the policy has a negligible net impact on homeownership.

A form of government-issued equity loan, Help to Buy is a British policy. Help to Buy is a policy that is extremely ineffective. Help to Buy in the Greater London Authority increased house prices by more than the implied subsidy, and it did not result in new housing construction.

There is little justification for the government to spend so much money on promoting home ownership. And they could have used those funds for education, transportation, or health care. Rather than creating a stable society, home ownership has been the West’s biggest economic policy mistake. A restoration of equilibrium is underway. The United States has capped its mortgage-interest tax deduction (from $1,000,000 to $750,000), while the United Kingdom has prohibited letting agents from charging tenants fees. We need to create a brand-new housing market. A solution that works for everyone.

If you have been considering buying, selling, or renting your home or have avoided the notion due to a negative experience, let Arsh Syed, a real estate agent in Toronto, manage the transaction.

His experience and understanding have been indispensable. He wants Toronto’s housing crisis to improve. He wants to establish relationships and spread the word about his exceptional service, increasing the likelihood that renters and property owners will place their faith in him.

Arsh wants property owners to know that by hiring him, they are drastically reducing risks, saving time, and saving money.

For further information about his services, please visit or contact (416) 844-2217

For more interesting blogs, please visit:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *